I began this venture expecting to hate the Snowflake Method.
For several years now I have detested it with every fibre of my being, all but
screamed when it came up in conversation, and only opened the website while
wearing my hazmat suit. Why? Well, first, to explain the method itself. For
those of you that haven’t heard of it, visit it here. Or if
you can’t be bothered, it basically works like this picture:
except where you see triangles, image the plot of your novel.
You start with a single sentence about your plot. And then you expand it into a
paragraph. And then you expand it into a page. And then you expand each
paragraph in that page into a page. And then you make a scene list. And then
you write a ‘multi-paragraph’ description of each scene. There are similar
steps for character creation. Theoretically, at the end of ten such steps, you
have a novel. Or you have stuck red-hot pins in your eyes from the sheer tedium
of the exercise. Either one.
By the time I’ve written my novel out in some six
ever-growing formats, I surely will be well and truly sick of it. At a guess, I
will get bored and abandon the novel long before the end. But right now I’m
only on step three, so who knows.
STEP ONE: Summarise your novel in a single sentence. This is
surprisingly effective at turning what is a vague kind of blob in your mind
into something that sounds exciting on paper. All you need is a setting, a few
words to describe you main character, and an explanation of the conflict. Here’s
one I prepared earlier from the work of my amazing sister:
In a university town,
a student of magical theory questions the line between good and evil when she
comes up against a sorcerer determined to bring back funding
for his major by any means.
So far, so good. And now, you are hopefully feeling excited
about your potential novel. Look how shiny it sounds!
STEP TWO: Write your novel in a paragraph. I seriously
struggled with this step. Ingermason, master of the Snowflake, suggests a
five-sentence paragraph, which I found was both too long to just write down a
really cool-sounding sentence, and too short to explain my plot in a useful any
kind of helpful detail. While this step appears to have the potential to tie
vague plot ideas together neatly into a cohesive whole, I really don’t think a
paragraph is enough to achieve that goal. I would suggest a bulleted list.
Everyone loves a bulleted list, and you won’t tie yourself in knots trying to
explain everything in one convoluted sentence. This paragraph, rather than
explaining my plot to me neatly, more ended up with a series of events between
which I don’t really see a connection, because I wasn’t able to fit it into my
five sentences.
STEP THREE: Write a page on each major character.
Confusingly, this is also step five. I’m really not sure why. Anyhow,
Ingermason gives a nice list of this to address in your page, the main ones of
which are goal, motivation, and story-line from your character’s point of view.
It obviously doesn’t hurt to think about any of this – on the contrary, there
is nothing worse than getting to the end of a draft, looking at that
plot-defining action, and going – but why?
Nonetheless, this step gets very tedious, very quickly, although I suppose this
would depend on the novel you are planning. In my case, most of my main
characters spend their time together and endeavour to achieve the same goal.
Which means I was writing out the same paragraph for story line and goal five
times. By the end, I was seriously struggling to find new ways to word it and
pretend it was a different paragraph. I see how this could be useful, but
whether step three is necessary is really very story-specific. And I still don't understand what I am supposed to do when I get to step five.
A final thought: Ingermason very much writes to be
published. From the very start he is talking about book proposals and editors
and other such things. While I do enjoy spending my spare time imagine the
future where I shall receive fanmail, and there will be fanfiction of my works,
and I will write witty messages in the starts of my novels thanking my friends
and family, when I sit down to write a novel, I’m not thinking about selling
it. I’m thinking about how amazing my next brilliant idea is, and imagining my unrealistically
attractive and talented characters. I don’t think that thinking about selling
at that stage is good for the creative process. Write the story you want to
read, not the story an imaginary agent does.
So in conclusion – do step one. It is exciting, and shiny,
and motivating. After that, I personally think it would be just as effective to
write a bulleted list of my plot points, organise them, and then start writing
as it is to follow Ingermason’s steps. But it worked for him, so who knows.